A Poetess In Our Midst [Archive] - PSI TECH Discussion Forums

View Full Version : A Poetess In Our Midst

kholmar

07-31-2001, 08:31 AM

<title>Re: Enterprise William Colston kholmar bill2@earthling.net</title>
the first officer is a vulcan and spock was not a doctor. 
 
dont mess with trekkies... 
 
 
LOL

Deleted User

07-31-2001, 10:44 AM

<title>Re: Enterprise Squeaky Wheel squeaky squeakywheel@hotmail.com</title>
On 7/31/01 8:31:16 AM, William Colston wrote: 
 
>dont mess with trekkies... 
> 
 
that reminds me.. 
A movie I recommend is a documentary called "Trekkies" 
 
it's a shocking look at the subculture surrounding the star trek series. 
 
~Squeaky~

johnm

07-31-2001, 05:52 PM

<title>Enterprise John M johnm n9vbt@hotmail.com</title>
YARFT = Yet Another Roddenberry Fairy Tale. 
 
Yawn. 
 
StarTrek did more to stifle Science Fiction than any other force, Richard Nixon included, in the 70's 80's and 90's. It took until the latter part of the 80's for anything resembling Sci Fi to return to screen and projector. Now, we get the next dose of pabulum. Yumm. :( 
 
John M. 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
Reality is fractal. It has a pattern with no discernable pattern. The finer you divide it, the more it remains the same.

Sheryll

07-31-2001, 10:40 PM

<title>Enterprise Sheryl Lynn Sheryll sheryll@pobox.alaska.net</title>
On 7/31/01 5:52:00 PM, John M wrote: 
>YARFT = Yet Another 
>Roddenberry Fairy Tale. 
> 
>Yawn. 
> 
>StarTrek did more to stifle 
>Science Fiction than any other 
>force, Richard Nixon included, 
>in the 70's 80's and 90's. It 
>took until the latter part of 
>the 80's for anything 
>resembling Sci Fi to return to 
>screen and projector. Now, we 
>get the next dose of pabulum. 
>Yumm. :( 
> 
>John M. 
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
>+++++++++ 
>Reality is fractal. It has a 
>pattern with no discernable 
>pattern. The finer you divide 
>it, the more it remains the 
>same. 
 
And just what do you call real Sci Fi? I think your statement is about as stupid as saying that the Indy 500 does not resemble auto racing. Just because you may not like it doesn't mean its not Sci Fi. It certainly isn't science fact or history or true tales. 
 
Sheryl

kholmar

08-01-2001, 08:08 AM

<title>Enterprise William Colston kholmar bill2@earthling.net</title>
hey john, keep your heretical sacrilege to yourself in the future. 
 
=) LOL

snow

08-01-2001, 08:24 AM

<title>Enterprise Kimberly Snow snow ksnow@cablespeed.com</title>
On 7/31/01 10:40:16 PM, Sheryl Lynn wrote: 
>On 7/31/01 5:52:00 PM, John M wrote: 
>>YARFT = Yet Another 
>>Roddenberry Fairy Tale. 
>> 
>>Yawn. 
>> 
>>StarTrek did more to stifle 
>>Science Fiction than any other 
>>force, Richard Nixon included, 
>>in the 70's 80's and 90's. It 
>>took until the latter part of 
>>the 80's for anything 
>>resembling Sci Fi to return to 
>>screen and projector. Now, we 
>>get the next dose of pabulum. 
>>Yumm. :( 
>> 
>>John M. 
>>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
>>+++++++++ 
>>Reality is fractal. It has a 
>>pattern with no discernable 
>>pattern. The finer you divide 
>>it, the more it remains the 
>>same. 
> 
>And just what do you call real Sci Fi? 
>I think your statement is about as 
>stupid as saying that the Indy 500 does 
>not resemble auto racing. Just because 
>you may not like it doesn't mean its not 
>Sci Fi. It certainly isn't science fact 
>or history or true tales. 
> 
>Sheryl 
> 
 
Hehe, I think John is going to have an exceptional answer to this one. (Although my feelings were a little hurt, being an old trekkie myself, and madly in love with Captain Kirk when I was a young girl). 
 
Kimberly

Sheryll

08-01-2001, 09:17 PM

<title>Enterprise Sheryl Lynn Sheryll sheryll@pobox.alaska.net</title>
On 8/1/01 8:24:14 AM, Kimberly Snow wrote: 
> 
> 
>Hehe, I think John is going to have an 
>exceptional answer to this one. 
>(Although my feelings were a little 
>hurt, being an old trekkie myself, and 
>madly in love with Captain Kirk when I 
>was a young girl). 
> 
>Kimberly 
> 
Myself it was Spock. Cool under pressure and only wanted sex once every 7 years. Captain Kirk kept breaking the rules and getting them into trouble and then having to work hard to survive. 
 
Sheryl

kholmar

08-02-2001, 10:12 AM

<title>Enterprise William Colston kholmar bill2@earthling.net</title>
>>> and only wanted sex once every 7 years. 
 
Thats a plus??? 
 
You hang with the wrong men hun. 
 
=)

snow

08-02-2001, 02:40 PM

<title>Enterprise Kimberly Snow snow ksnow@cablespeed.com</title>
On 8/2/01 10:12:12 AM, William Colston wrote: 
>>>> and only wanted sex once every 7 years. 
> 
>Thats a plus??? 
> 
>You hang with the wrong men 
>hun. 
> 
>=) 
 
Hehe, and you're surprised? 
 
Kimberly

Sheryll

08-02-2001, 10:02 PM

<title>Enterprise Sheryl Lynn Sheryll sheryll@pobox.alaska.net</title>
On 8/2/01 10:12:12 AM, William Colston wrote: 
>>>> and only wanted sex once every 7 years. 
> 
>Thats a plus??? 
> 
>You hang with the wrong men 
>hun. 
> 
>=) 
 
Can you keep a women satisfied by only doing it once every seven years? I didn't think so. Think about it. If you have to do it every night you must be lacking something. 
 
Sheryl

jaymac

08-03-2001, 07:43 AM

<title>Enterprise Laurie McDougall jaymac ljmcdougall@telus.net</title>
On 8/2/01 10:02:06 PM, Sheryl Lynn wrote: 
>On 8/2/01 10:12:12 AM, William Colston 
>wrote: 
>>>>> and only wanted sex once every 7 years. 
>> 
>>Thats a plus??? 
>> 
>>You hang with the wrong men 
>>hun. 
>> 
>>=) 
> 
>Can you keep a women satisfied by only 
>doing it once every seven years? I 
>didn't think so. Think about it. If 
>you have to do it every night you must 
>be lacking something. 
> 
>Sheryl 
> 
 
 
once every seven years?? geez, sheryl you gotta work on those people skills....hehehehehe 
 
Mac

snow

08-03-2001, 08:55 AM

<title>Enterprise Kimberly Snow snow ksnow@cablespeed.com</title>
On 8/2/01 10:02:06 PM, Sheryl Lynn wrote: 
>On 8/2/01 10:12:12 AM, William Colston 
>wrote: 
>>>>> and only wanted sex once every 7 years. 
>> 
>>Thats a plus??? 
>> 
>>You hang with the wrong men 
>>hun. 
>> 
>>=) 
> 
>Can you keep a women satisfied by only 
>doing it once every seven years? I 
>didn't think so. Think about it. If 
>you have to do it every night you must 
>be lacking something. 
> 
>Sheryl 
> 
Some people actually enjoy it, Sheryl. 
 
Kimberly

kholmar

08-03-2001, 11:31 AM

<title>Enterprise William Colston kholmar bill2@earthling.net</title>
I have to hide from my wife but its her, not necessarily me. LOL 
 
billiam

Sheryll

08-03-2001, 11:51 PM

<title>Enterprise Sheryl Lynn Sheryll sheryll@pobox.alaska.net</title>
On 8/3/01 8:55:14 AM, Kimberly Snow wrote: 
>On 8/2/01 10:02:06 PM, Sheryl Lynn 
>wrote: 
>>On 8/2/01 10:12:12 AM, William Colston 
>>wrote: 
>>>>>> and only wanted sex once every 7 years. 
>>> 
>>>Thats a plus??? 
>>> 
>>>You hang with the wrong men 
>>>hun. 
>>> 
>>>=) 
>> 
>>Can you keep a women satisfied by only 
>>doing it once every seven years? I 
>>didn't think so. Think about it. If 
>>you have to do it every night you must 
>>be lacking something. 
>> 
>>Sheryl 
>> 
>Some people actually enjoy it, Sheryl. 
> 
>Kimberly 
> 
> 
You all obviously have missed the point and I refuse to give you the kindergarden version. 
 
Sheryl

snow

08-04-2001, 04:10 PM

<title>Enterprise Kimberly Snow snow ksnow@cablespeed.com</title>
On 8/3/01 11:51:14 PM, Sheryl Lynn wrote: 
 
>> 
>You all obviously have missed the point 
 
>Sheryl 
> 
 
No, we're just making fun of you. 
 
Kimberly

ex-animo

09-01-2001, 06:08 PM

<title>A Poetess In Our Midst Gene Smith ex-animo genefsmith@att.net</title>
Because our own poet laureate (aka Snowball) is too modest to mention this herself, I'll just do it for her. Her newly published book is soon to be available in stores everywhere including Amazon.com and Barnes & Noble. Info is available at her web site: 
<a target=_new href="http://www.ksnow.com/">http://www.ksnow.com/</a>