Manuscript origin

[Loving]

As this is a place for suggestions...

I would very much like to know the origin of "a course in miracles" by Helen Schucman and William Thetford.

When I say origin I mean of course for whom Helen wrote.

Thanks!

[snow]

That's something that could easily be remote viewed. If you have learned TRV, I could assist you with a cue if you'd like.

Kimberly

[Loving]

Hi Snow,
I just received the tape set this week (i'm torqued) and am in the process of learning how to decipher ideograms.

Can I get a rain check?

[snow]

Hi Snow,
I just received the tape set this week (i'm torqued) and am in the process of learning how to decipher ideograms.

Can I get a rain check?

Of course!

[Loving]

Your very kind:)
Can I bother you to explain how that works? Wouldn't it be a front loaded target as I already know what your going to ask?

Bear with me, I'm still learning the basics:p

[snow]

There are never any true "frontloaded" targets, because even though you may know the cue, you never know the answer to the cue. I could, for example, know that I am remote viewing the disappearence of the spacecraft Mars Climate Orbiter, but I don't know what caused the disappearence, so I don't know what kind of data I'm going to get.

The same holds true for your target. If you want to find out the origin or the original seed or inspiration for a manuscript, you may know that the cue has been developed to get that answer from the Matrix, but you don't know what the answer is going to be. Now you may have presuppositions going into the session, (most of us do, unless you're brain dead or a zen monk), but a skilled TRVer with enough experience and practice under his/her belt has trained his/her mind in the protocals of TRV, and knows how to seperate out imagination (presupposition) from raw, actual data. Being able to do frontloaded targets is an asset to any remote viewer. But frontloaded sessions can only really be trusted once you have reached a certain level of proficiency. (Or if your frontloaded session data corroborates with others who have done the target also, who are more proficient.)

Kimberly

[Loving]

Thanks for taking the time to explain that so thoroughly Snow! Every little bit of technique is very welcome (by me anyway :D ).

[Ingram]

Well, it's been 2-1/2 years this month since my original post on this thread and I have finally remote viewed this topic. It was pretty intense.

If you have the mind, you can view the whole session here. (http://s364.photobucket.com/albums/oo89/remote_viewer/ACIM/First/)