PDA

View Full Version : donkey rider banned


jaymac
02-27-2001, 05:43 PM
On 2/27/01 1:04:40 PM, Bobbie Lee wrote:<br>
>Jayna wrote: "Sheryl, ...<br>
>Frankly, it seems you say a<br>
>lot that means nothing."<br>
><br>
>Why the sudden picking on<br>
>Sheryl? Have I missed<br>
>something here? I find her<br>
>posts to be succinct and<br>
>thought-provoking, and her<br>
>subtle humor is a pleasant<br>
>delight. If a reader thinks<br>
>she says a lot that means<br>
>nothing, perhaps the reader is<br>
>misinterpreting or simply<br>
>doesn't "get it."<br>
><br>
>A discussion board like this<br>
>one challenges the way people<br>
>think, and WHY they think the<br>
>way they do. Sheryl hits the<br>
>bull's eye every time.<br>
><br>
>Sheryl, come back! <br>
><br>
Bobbie, do a search on Sheryl's posts, and you will see why people are upset and a little hurt at her attitude toward everything! she keeps threatening to invade Canada etc. etc. and generally behaves like a bully. She does not believe in TRV and seems to scorn those who are trying to learn it. It's a mystery why she is here. Frankly some of us suspect that Sheryl is really a man hiding behind a womans name. lots of tough talk, no guts to stand behind the words.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>

snow
02-27-2001, 10:31 PM
On 2/27/01 1:04:40 PM, Bobbie Lee wrote:<br>
>Jayna wrote: "Sheryl, ...<br>
>Frankly, it seems you say a<br>
>lot that means nothing."<br>
><br>
>Why the sudden picking on<br>
>Sheryl? Have I missed<br>
>something here? I find her<br>
>posts to be succinct and<br>
>thought-provoking, and her<br>
>subtle humor is a pleasant<br>
>delight. If a reader thinks<br>
>she says a lot that means<br>
>nothing, perhaps the reader is<br>
>misinterpreting or simply<br>
>doesn't "get it."<br>
><br>
>A discussion board like this<br>
>one challenges the way people<br>
>think, and WHY they think the<br>
>way they do. Sheryl hits the<br>
>bull's eye every time.<br>
><br>
>Sheryl, come back! <br>
><br>
><br>
Yes, Sheryl adds a dimension to this bulletin board, this is true. But this is a psitech bulletin board, and while we obviously discuss all facets of life, from food, to health, to politics, to space, there is one thing most of us share, and are very passionate about, and that is remote viewing, technical remote viewing. To constantly be a member of this discussion panel and at the same time be cynical and derogatory towards trv is offensive to many of us, and I would hazard to say, most of us here who trv on a regular basis. It would be similar to a democrat continually visiting a Republican National Committee web site to insult and slander republicans. I don't care how succinct, or delightful the humor or discussion is, it's still offensive. I would suggest that she either keeps her comments on the subject of trv to herself until she has purchased the tapes and learned the skill and knows what she's talking about, or find an alternate web site that might be better suited to her beliefs and interests. She adds a depth to this board that has provided many an interesting discussion, but her comments regarding this company's main commitment, to the promotion and education of technical remote viewing, is quite frankly uncalled for.<br>
<br>
Kimberly<br>

snow
02-28-2001, 09:12 AM
* DONKEY RIDER BANNED FROM DRIVE-IN: A New Zealand<br>
farmer who likes to ride into a drive-in cinema and<br>
watch movies from the back of his donkey has been<br>
banned from the premises by theater management, who<br>
say he blocks the view of other patrons. The donkey<br>
rider, Geoff Roder, says he goes to the movies with<br>
the animal because it's his only companion -- and<br>
because he doesn't have a car. He says he'll sue. <br>
<br>
(from Morrock News)<br>

kholmar
03-01-2001, 09:31 AM
I remember when it was just me she didnt like...<br>
<br>
<br>