TRV w/patch over right eye?

wildfire · #1 04-19-2002, 11:39 AM

<title>Discontinuity causation identified? Patrick Duda wildfire wildfire@trv-psitech.com</title>
On 4/18/02 3:48:00 PM, Et Friendly wrote: 
>As crazy as it may sound, 
>there is a theory that the 
>moon is a spaceship. Even Ingo 
>Swann believes there is the 
>possibility that it was driven 
>into orbit around the Earth. 
 
If <a href="http://www.psitech.net/wildfire/images.jpg" target="_blank">ZIM</a> could do it, I'm sure others could. 
 
>Keeping the moon 
>stationary in front of the sun 
>would definitely cause some 
>people to look up. And the 
>disturbance in the 
>gravitational pull between the 
>Earth and the moon might 
>affect the speed of rotation 
>of the Earth so that some 
>people would fall down. 
 
Anything that happens on that scale would undoubtably cause a lot greater problems, like breakups in the Earth's crust. 
 
>The moon is one third the size 
>of the Earth. It might have to 
>be moved a little closer to 
>the Earth to completely block 
>out the Sun, but for a 
>technologically advanced race 
>it may be very easy to do. 
 
Actually it'd have to be moved farther out. 
 
<img src="http://www.psitech.net/images/sig_light.jpg"> Survival Tips #291: Always cross a vampire, but never moon a werewolf.

etfriendly · #2 04-19-2002, 04:32 PM

<title>Discontinuity causation identified? Et Friendly etfriendly etfriendly@go.com</title>
>The moon is one third the size 
>of the Earth. It might have to 
>be moved a little closer to 
>the Earth to completely block 
>out the Sun, but for a 
>technologically advanced race 
>it may be very easy to do. 
 
"Actually it'd have to be moved farther out." 
 
You may be right but the way I visualize it goes like this: imagine holding a quarter at arms length (representing the Sun) and with your other arm a round pinhead about 2 inches from your eye. As you move it closer to your eye (representing the Earth) you reach a point where it completely blocks the quarter. 

Either way, spaceship moon's orbit could be adjusted.

etfriendly · #3 04-19-2002, 04:44 PM

<title>Discontinuity causation identified? Et Friendly etfriendly etfriendly@go.com</title>
>Keeping the moon 
>stationary in front of the sun 
>would definitely cause some 
>people to look up. And the 
>disturbance in the 
>gravitational pull between the 
>Earth and the moon might 
>affect the speed of rotation 
>of the Earth so that some 
>people would fall down. 
 
"Anything that happens on that scale would undoubtably cause a lot greater problems, like breakups in the Earth's crust." 
 
The actual effects of an event of that magnitude are unknown.

kholmar · #4 04-20-2002, 10:01 PM

<title>Discontinuity causation identified? William Colston kholmar kholmar@happyeverafter.net</title>
>>> You may be right but the way I visualize it goes like this: imagine holding a quarter at arms length (representing the Sun) and with your other arm a round pinhead about 2 inches from your eye. As you move it closer to your eye (representing the Earth) you reach a point where it completely blocks the quarter. 
Either way, spaceship moon's orbit could be adjusted. 
 
your logic is sound but; 
at the distances and diameters we are dealing with here, a quarter at arms length is not a good analogy. the sun is a point-source at these distances and diameters. 
think of a cone of light from the sun and the moon has to be moved out far enough to compensate for the fact that the earth is bigger than the moon to block the entire cone.

Sheryll · #5 04-21-2002, 12:27 AM

<title>Discontinuity causation identified? Sheryl Lynn Sheryll sheryll@pobox.alaska.net</title>
On 4/20/02 10:01:00 PM, William Colston wrote: 
>>>> You may be right but the way I visualize it goes like this: imagine holding a quarter at arms length (representing the Sun) and with your other arm a round pinhead about 2 inches from your eye. As you move it closer to your eye (representing the Earth) you reach a point where it completely blocks the quarter. 
>Either way, spaceship moon's 
>orbit could be adjusted. 
> 
>your logic is sound but; 
>at the distances and diameters 
>we are dealing with here, a 
>quarter at arms length is not 
>a good analogy. the sun is a 
>point-source at these 
>distances and diameters. 
>think of a cone of light from 
>the sun and the moon has to be 
>moved out far enough to 
>compensate for the fact that 
>the earth is bigger than the 
>moon to block the entire cone. 
 
Try it with a softball, (earth) and a tennis ball (moon). 
 
Sheryl

etfriendly · #6 04-21-2002, 07:37 AM

<title>Discontinuity causation identified? Et Friendly etfriendly etfriendly@go.com</title>
I understand now. Yes I can see how the moon would have to be driven away from Earth. I've been illuminated (couldn't help myself) :-) Thank you William and Sheryl.

Sheryll · #7 04-22-2002, 03:17 AM

<title>Discontinuity causation identified? Sheryl Lynn Sheryll sheryll@pobox.alaska.net</title>
On 4/21/02 7:37:00 AM, Et Friendly wrote: 
>I understand now. Yes I can 
>see how the moon would have to 
>be driven away from Earth. 
>I've been illuminated 
>(couldn't help myself) :-) 
>Thank you William and Sheryl. 
 
Now the real question: Where do you go to get your moon driving license?

Sheryl

etfriendly · #8 04-22-2002, 11:46 AM

<title>Discontinuity causation identified? Et Friendly etfriendly etfriendly@go.com</title>
Zeta Reticuli Dept. of Motor Vehicles? :-)

johnm · #9 04-22-2002, 05:53 PM

<title>Discontinuity causation identified? John M johnm n9vbt@hotmail.com</title>
On 4/22/02 11:46:00 AM, Et Friendly wrote: 
>Zeta Reticuli Dept. of Motor 
>Vehicles? :-) 
 
In the second sub basement, in a locked file cabinet, behind the door with the sign that says "Beware the Leopard". 
 
John M. 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
Reality is fractal. It has a pattern with no discernable pattern. The finer you divide it, the more it remains the same.

etfriendly · #10 04-22-2002, 09:53 PM

<title>Discontinuity causation identified? Et Friendly etfriendly etfriendly@go.com</title>
From the Jim Marrs book 'Alien Agenda':
 
"The Spaceship Moon Theory- 
In July 1970, two Russian scientists offered a bizarre theory of the origins of the moon. Michael Vasin and Alexander Scherbakov published an article in the Soviet journal Sputnik entitled "Is the moon a creation of alien intelligence?" 
The Soviet scientists put forward the belief that the moon is not a completely natural world but a planetoid, hollowed out eons ago in the far reaches of space. Huge machines were used to melt rock and form large cavities within the moon, spewing the molten refuse onto the surface. Protected by a hull-like inner shell plus a reconstructed outer shell of metallic rocky junk, this gigantic craft was steered through the cosmos and finally parked in orbit around our earth. 
 
The theory was re-vitalized in 1975 with the publication of Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon by Don Wilson. He stated that "Too many pieces of evidence seem to fit to reject the theory without investigation." 
 
There is even tantalizing evidence that in the dim recesses of human memory there have been recollections of a time before the arrival of the moon. Aristotle told of a people who lived in Arcadia, a mountainous region in Central Greece, long before the coming of the Greeks. The Greek term Proscelene means before the moon. In Tibetan texts there are stories of a people on a lost continent called Gondwana, said to be civilized before the moon shone in the night sky. Bolivian symbols have been interpreted by Dr. P. Allen as records that a satellite came into orbit around the Earth about 11,500 to 13,000 years ago."

snow · #11 04-23-2002, 03:38 PM

<title>Discontinuity causation identified? Kimberly Snow snow ksnow@psitech.net</title>
Read Pentetration, by Ingo Swann, if you really want to get freaked out.. 
 
Kimberly

etfriendly · #12 04-24-2002, 06:41 PM

<title>Discontinuity causation identified? Et Friendly etfriendly etfriendly@go.com</title>
On 4/23/02 3:38:00 PM, Kimberly Snow wrote: 
>Read Pentetration, by Ingo 
>Swann, if you really want to 
>get freaked out.. 
> 
>Kimberly 
 
Yes, Penetration is definitely way out there. What Ingo relates is so fantastic that I had to ask myself whether I could trust the source. My gut feeling is that he is an honest person of high integrity.

snow · #13 04-25-2002, 09:41 AM

<title>Discontinuity causation identified? Kimberly Snow snow ksnow@psitech.net</title>
On 4/24/02 6:41:00 PM, Et Friendly wrote: 
>On 4/23/02 3:38:00 PM, Kimberly Snow 
>wrote: 
>>Read Pentetration, by Ingo 
>>Swann, if you really want to 
>>get freaked out.. 
>> 
>>Kimberly 
> 
>Yes, Penetration is definitely way out 
>there. What Ingo relates is so fantastic 
>that I had to ask myself whether I could 
>trust the source. My gut feeling is that 
>he is an honest person of high 
>integrity. 
 
indeed....

SMHoke · #14 05-19-2002, 10:24 AM

<title>TRV w/patch over right eye? Michael Hoke SMHoke SMHoke@AOL.com</title>
Hi: 
 
Has anyone out there tried a TRV session using a patch over the right eye during TRV stages in which left hemisphere function is not desirable? It seems this may be a good way for people like me who seem to get more AOL than anything else from S2 on. 
 
Thanks for your input, 
Michael Hoke

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
mysterious topic	TimHill2	Technical Remote Viewing	2	05-31-2002 04:01 PM